Re: Reverse Osmosis unit

From: James Aldridge (jaldr@onramp.net)
Date: Sat Jun 07 1997 - 19:50:38 PDT

Next message: Perry Malouf: "Re: Nepenthes confusion"
Previous message: Ken Cusson: "Nepenthes confusion"
Maybe in reply to: Paul Burkhardt: "Reverse Osmosis unit"
Next in thread: Michael Zenner: "Re: Reverse Osmosis unit"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Date: Sun, 08 Jun 1997 02:50:38 GMT
From: jaldr@onramp.net (James Aldridge)
To: cp@opus.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <aabcdefg2232$foo@default>
Subject: Re: Reverse Osmosis unit

>I found the unit paid for itself within the first few months. I was =
easily
>using five gallons of distilled water per day, which got awfully =
expensive.

The units I've looked at have sediment and carbon pre-filters, the RO =
filter,
and then a carbon "finish" filter. All of these filters have to be =
changed on a
regular basis, and for most people, the water costs money.=20

Have you estimated these costs compared to the cost of buying bulk =
distilled
water?

I suspect the RO unit is still a good deal, but the water's not free =
either way.

Jim

James Aldridge - Fort Worth, Texas, USA
jaldr@onramp.net or aldrjame@tenet.edu
http://rampages.onramp.net/~jaldr

Next message: Perry Malouf: "Re: Nepenthes confusion"
Previous message: Ken Cusson: "Nepenthes confusion"
Maybe in reply to: Paul Burkhardt: "Reverse Osmosis unit"
Next in thread: Michael Zenner: "Re: Reverse Osmosis unit"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jan 02 2001 - 17:31:04 PST