I have a couple of questions regarding a couple of Brazilian
          Utrics I've got growing from seed from Fernandos friend
          Fabio. (Incidentally, if any of you are waiting to hear back
          from Fabio, its definitely worth the wait. I've heard
          nothing but good reports of the Brazilian seed. He also
          writes a nice letter with all sorts of information about the
          plants).
          U.blanchetii white flower - this is a beautiful plant,
          lowerlip white with a yellow spot, upperlip white with dark
          purple stripes. Reading through Peter Taylors book this
          colouration is similar to that of the related species
          U.parthenopipes. Taylor mentions other differences between
          U.parthenopipes and U.blanchetii as being  the different
          shaped upper lip (transversely elliptic or sub reniform in
          U.blanchetii, and broadly obovate-cuneate in
          U.parthenopipes), differences in the spur and smaller
          corolla in U.parthenopipes.
          The problem I have is this, the upperlips of my purple
          flowered and white flowered U.blanchetii show considerable
          variation - some fit into Taylors description of
          U.blanchetii others into the description of U.parthenopipes.
          The main difference between the white and purple flower
          forms (other than the flower colour of coarse!) is the white
          flowers are slightly smaller. Fernando are you familiar with
          U.parthenopipes and if so how does this differ from the
          white flowered U.blanchetii?
          Another Brazilian I have grown from seed is U.hispida, and I
          have small plants from seed from 2 different locations. What
          is interesting about these small plants is that they have
          two types of leaves like U.praelonga (in many respects they
          are like a miniature version  of U.praelonga). Some leaves
          are ovoid in shape where as others are grass like on the
          same plant. My second question again arises from reading
          Taylor. In his discussion on U.hispida he states ' Specimens
          bearing the two types of leaf are not common and have been
          seen only from Surinam, where they grew on granitic rocks'.
          Is this phenomena that unusual or is it just the case that
          the seedlings/ small plants display both leaf types whereas
          the adult plants generally don't ?
          I look forward to any comments on these observations.
          Kind regards
          Loyd