Re: Utricularia inflata as weed

From: Dave Evans (dpevans@rci.rutgers.edu)
Date: Thu Aug 03 2000 - 17:38:16 PDT

Next message: Fabien ZUNINO: "Utricularia vulgaris and australis"
Previous message: Barry Meyers-Rice: "Utricularia inflata as weed"
Maybe in reply to: Barry Meyers-Rice: "Utricularia inflata as weed"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 20:38:16 -0400
From: "Dave Evans" <dpevans@rci.rutgers.edu>
To: cp@opus.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <aabcdefg2346$foo@default>
Subject: Re: Utricularia inflata as weed

Dear Barry,

Any idea on which view is correct?

Dave Evans

> This is an interesting page that profiles Utricularia inflata in
> Washington, where the Washington Department of Ecology considers it a
> non-native, invasive weed.
>
> This is particularly interesting, perhaps, because some declare that
> U. inflata is a native plant in Washington.

Next message: Fabien ZUNINO: "Utricularia vulgaris and australis"
Previous message: Barry Meyers-Rice: "Utricularia inflata as weed"
Maybe in reply to: Barry Meyers-Rice: "Utricularia inflata as weed"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jan 02 2001 - 17:35:11 PST